GTZ
Ministry of Agriculture and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH
NAIROBI - JUNE, 1998
Copyright: GTZ 1998
The copyright of this publication is vested in the "Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH". Applications for permissions to reproduce this publication, in whole or in part, by any method or process, should be addressed, with a statement of purpose and extend of the reproduction desired, to GTZ - Stabsstelle 01, Postfach 5180, D-65726 Eschborn, Germany.
This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software and careful manual recorrection. Even if the quality of digitalisation is high, the FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Methodology
1.3. Contribution of the country study to the FAO framework
2.1. Importance of potato production and consumption in Kenya
2.2. Potato production characteristics in Meru district
2.3. On-farm post-harvest operations
2.4. Structure of the marketing system2.5. Margins in the chain
2.6. Summary on functioning of market
2.7. Processing
2.8. Urban consumption
3.1. Production and consumption in Kenya
3.2. Production characteristics of sweet potato in the Kisii district
3.3. On-farm post-harvest operations for sweet potato in the Kisii district
3.4. Structure of the marketing system3.4.1. Different market places
3.4.2. Actors in the market chain3.5. Margins in the chain
3.6. Consumption patterns
3.7. On-farm processing of sweet potato
4.1. Comparative analysis of the post-harvest system of potato and sweet potato
4.1.1. Production characteristics
4.1.2. Demand characteristics
4.1.3. Post-harvest chains
4.1.4. Efficiency of the post-harvest system
4.1.5. Labour requirement and value added at the farm and at the different stages of the post-harvest system
4.1.6. Institutions involved in the potato and sweet potato post-harvest systems
4.1.7. Stability of the system
4.1.8. Constraints in the post-harvest system4.2. Analysis of gender participation in post-harvest systems
Annex 1a: Map of Kenya showing major potato producing areas (Guyton et al., 1994)
Annex 1b: Map of Kenya showing major sweet potato producing areas (estimated 1994 hectares)
Annex 2a: Background statistics on production of major agricultural commodities in Kenya (in 1000 t)
Annex 3b: Sweet potato crop budget
Annex 4: Post-harvest consumption analysis of sweet potato in Kenya - Survey
Executive summary
Introduction
Purpose and justification
Methodology
Results
Household consumption survey
Summary and conclusion
ReferencesAnnex 5b: Constraints of the PH system - Hypotheses from key informant interviews; Survey findings
Annex 6: Seminar on post-harvest systems analysis, 6 March 1997: Summary of discussion
Annex 7: Time schedule of field study in Kenya
Annex 8a: List of persons and organisations contacted
Annex 8c: List of participants of the seminar on post-harvest systems analysis (March 1997)
I. Purpose of meeting
II. Improvements to the post-harvest analysis model
III. Action plan
IV. Other business
V. The way forward
Annex 1: List of participantsA. Introduction
B. Technical co-operation (TC) and financial co-operation (FC) as complementary approaches of development co-operation (DC)
C. Kenya - The agricultural sector as a test case for viewing TC and FC as one system
D. The post-harvest system and the intervention system two systems views